NVIDIA T1000 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T1000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T1000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T1000
2.5 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
+227%
8.192 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
T1000
3073
Radeon R9 Nano
+52%
4677
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
T1000
1406
Radeon R9 Nano
+55%
2191
Graphics Card
May 2021
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro Turing
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
4096
56
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
44.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
78.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
5.000 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
2.500 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
78.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
175W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Fiji
-
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA
(215-0862120)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.3
