Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs ATI FirePro V8750

NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs ATI FirePro V8750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 151W)
ATI FirePro V8750 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
T400 4 GB
1.094 TFLOPS
FirePro V8750 +9%
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2021
Release Date
Jul 2008
Quadro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

420 MHz
Base Clock
-
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
6
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
800
24
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
151W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy