Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
168 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 171W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
T400 4 GB +104%
1.094 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2021
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

420 MHz
Base Clock
-
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
27
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
216
24
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
171W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy