NVIDIA T400 vs ATI FireGL V5600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM T400 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
264 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 89W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T400
+469%
1.094 TFLOPS
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2021
Release Date
Aug 2007
Quadro
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
420 MHz
Base Clock
-
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR4
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
6
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
120
24
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
30W
TDP
89W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
RV630
-
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
