Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA T400 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA T400 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM T400 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 49% (2130MHz vs 1425MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +996%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2021
Release Date
Feb 2024
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

420 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
22
384
Shading Units
2816
24
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy