Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA T400 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA T400 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM T400 and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 76% (2505MHz vs 1425MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
17792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada Generation +8223%
91.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2021
Release Date
Dec 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

420 MHz
Base Clock
915 MHz
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
142
384
Shading Units
18176
24
TMUs
568
16
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102
Turing
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy