NVIDIA Tegra 3 GPU vs AMD FirePro A300
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Tegra 3 GPU and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tegra 3 GPU 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 65W)
AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 74% (905MHz vs 520MHz)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2011
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tegra
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
416 MHz
Base Clock
760 MHz
520 MHz
Boost Clock
905 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.240 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
695.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
20W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Kal-El
GPU Name
Devastator
T30-P-A3
GPU Variant
A300
VLIW Vec4
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
32 nm
0.01 billion
Transistors
1.303 billion
80 mm²
Die Size
246 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
ES 2.0
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
5.0
