Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C1060 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

NVIDIA Tesla C1060 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Tesla C1060 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C1060 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 188W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C1060 +2292%
0.622 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 360M
0.026 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2009
Release Date
May 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
2
240
Shading Units
16
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

188W
TDP
17W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
NB8M-GLM
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy