Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C1060 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

NVIDIA Tesla C1060 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Tesla C1060 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C1060 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 188W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C1060 +122%
0.622 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2009
Release Date
Jan 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
14
240
Shading Units
112
80
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

188W
TDP
78W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy