Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C1060 vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100

NVIDIA Tesla C1060 vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Tesla C1060 and 16GB VRAM Quadro GP100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C1060 's Advantages
Lower TDP (188W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Quadro GP100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1442MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
3344 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C1060
0.622 TFLOPS
Quadro GP100 +1562%
10.34 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2009
Release Date
Oct 2016
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1304 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1442 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
512bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
56
240
Shading Units
3584
80
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.4 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
323.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.67 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.34 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.168 TFLOPS

Board Design

188W
TDP
235W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GP100
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
6.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy