Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C1060 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

NVIDIA Tesla C1060 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Tesla C1060 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 188W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C1060
0.622 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000M +245%
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2009
Release Date
Aug 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
240
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
N16E-Q1-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

188W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy