Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C1060 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Tesla C1060 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Tesla C1060 and 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C1060 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
912 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 188W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C1060
0.622 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 Mobile +378%
2.974 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2009
Release Date
Feb 2019
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1291 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
9
240
Shading Units
1152
80
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS

Board Design

188W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GP106
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy