Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C1060 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

NVIDIA Tesla C1060 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Tesla C1060 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C1060 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 188W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2009
Release Date
Mar 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-III

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
240
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.200 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
G71
-
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
90 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.278 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Board Design

188W
TDP
45W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy