Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 8

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 8

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 and 8GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 8 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (238W vs 260W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 8 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
4160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 8 +1150%
12.86 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Unknown
Tesla
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
72
448
Shading Units
4608
56
TMUs
288
48
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.9 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
401.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
25.71 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.86 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
401.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

238W
TDP
260W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
TU102
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy