Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 and 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (47W vs 238W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro P1000 +84%
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Feb 2017
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1266 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
5
448
Shading Units
640
56
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.36 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.60 GFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

238W
TDP
47W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GP107
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
GP107-860-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy