CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
VS
NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Intel Arctic Sound M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (238W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
7744 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
+1334%
14.75 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jan 2022
Tesla
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
8192
56
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
DG2-512
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Board Design
238W
TDP
500W
550 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
2
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
3
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Tesla M1060
4
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
5
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
6
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
7
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB
8
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X
9
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
10
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA A10M
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy