Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 and 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
6976 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 238W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 Mobile +2066%
22.27 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2022
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
58
448
Shading Units
7424
56
TMUs
232
48
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
348.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.27 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.27 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
348.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

238W
TDP
165W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GA103
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
22 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy