NVIDIA Tesla C2070 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2070 and 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 143.4GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2070
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro K6000
+405%
5.196 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jul 2013
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
797 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
747 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
2880
56
TMUs
240
48
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.12 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.732 TFLOPS
Board Design
238W
TDP
225W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GK110B
-
GPU Variant
GK110-890-B1
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
