NVIDIA Tesla C2070 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2070 and 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2070 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (47W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2070
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro P1000
+84%
1.894 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Feb 2017
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1266 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
747 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
5
448
Shading Units
640
56
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.36 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.60 GFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
238W
TDP
47W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
GP107-860-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
