NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 34.14GB/s)
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
+60%
1.028 TFLOPS
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
0.64 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2023
Tesla
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1067 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
34.14GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
4
448
Shading Units
512
56
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
16
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1280 GFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
640.0 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
320.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
10W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GA10B
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
520 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
