CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
VS
NVIDIA Tesla C2075
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 34.14GB/s)
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
+60%
1.028 TFLOPS
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
0.64 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
VS
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2023
Tesla
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1067 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
34.14GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
512
56
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
16
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1280 GFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
640.0 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
320.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GA10B
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
520 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Board Design
247W
TDP
10W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GRID K500 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
2
NVIDIA Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
3
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
4
NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
5
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
6
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
8
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
9
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
10
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA GRID M60 1Q
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy