Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 4GB VRAM Quadro 5010M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 5010M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 247W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075 +48%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro 5010M
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Feb 2011
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
783 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
12
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GF110
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
N12E-Q5
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

247W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy