Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (12GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (239W vs 247W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro K6000 SDI +405%
5.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jul 2013
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
2880
56
TMUs
240
48
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.12 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.732 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GK110
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

247W
TDP
239W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
3x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2 3x SDI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy