CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
VS
NVIDIA Tesla C2075
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+189%
2.974 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
VS
Quadro P2000 Mobile
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Feb 2019
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1291 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
9
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
1152
56
TMUs
72
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GP106
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Board Design
247W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GRID K500 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
2
NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
4
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
5
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
6
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
8
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA GRID K520
9
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB
10
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro 7000
Related News
1
Complete Layout of Intel's Next-Gen LGA1851 Interface Exposed: A Comprehensive Look at PCIe and USB Features
2
Apple's 2025 OS in Development: iOS 19 Codename 'Luck'
3
Apple's AI is Memory Hungry! The Entire iPhone 16 Lineup Comes with 8GB RAM
4
Noctua Announce NH-D15 G2 Air Cooler and NF-A14x25r G2 Fan
5
The P-Cores and E-Cores in Arrow Lake Will Be Interleaved, Reducing Core Communication Latency and Improving Heat Dissipation
6
Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits
7
Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU
8
Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4
9
AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds
10
Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy