CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
VS
NVIDIA Tesla C2075
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1815MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
2624 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (230W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000
+984%
11.15 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
VS
Quadro RTX 5000
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Aug 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1815 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
48
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
3072
56
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.2 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
348.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.30 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.15 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
348.5 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
TU104
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
TU104-875-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Board Design
247W
TDP
230W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GRID K500 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
2
NVIDIA Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
3
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
4
NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
5
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
6
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
8
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB
9
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
10
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 S4
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy