CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
VS
NVIDIA Tesla C2090
Intel Arctic Sound M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
+1007%
14.75 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jan 2022
Tesla
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
8192
64
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
500W
600 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro VX 200
2
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40s
3
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200
4
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380
5
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200
6
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
7
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Tesla S1070
8
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m
9
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA GRID A100B
10
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
Related News
1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy