Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock784MHz
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (108W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200 +58%
2.107 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jul 2014
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
784 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
1344
64
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
108W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy