Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
464 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090 +948%
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Aug 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
6
512
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
65W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
G94
-
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy