Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Max Q +974%
14.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2022
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
46
512
Shading Units
5888
64
TMUs
184
48
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
80W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GA104
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy