CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
VS
NVIDIA Tesla C2090
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro K5100M
+77%
2.369 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
VS
Quadro K5100M
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jul 2013
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.67 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.69 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.369 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.69 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q5-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
2
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
3
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
4
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
5
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
6
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
8
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q
9
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB
10
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy