Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1404MHz
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Max Q +277%
5.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Feb 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1139 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1404 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.86 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
78.62 GFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.032 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GP104
-
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy