Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 4GB VRAM Quadro P600 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090 +7%
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro P600 Mobile
1.244 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Feb 2017
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Pascal-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1430 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1252 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
80.13GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
3
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.92 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.88 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.44 GFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1244 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
38.88 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
40W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy