Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q +250%
4.666 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
May 2019
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
30
512
Shading Units
1920
64
TMUs
120
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.76 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
145.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.331 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.666 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
145.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
60W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
TU106
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy