Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Max Q +149%
3.318 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
May 2019
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
16
512
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
40W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy