Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (160W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000 +434%
7.119 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Nov 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1005 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
36
512
Shading Units
2304
64
TMUs
144
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.24 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
160W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
TU104-850-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy