Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (110W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh +612%
9.492 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jun 2020
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
48
512
Shading Units
3072
64
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.98 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.492 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
296.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
110W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
TU104B
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy