Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216 +1076%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Nov 2019
Tesla
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1312 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
5120
64
TMUs
320
48
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GV100
-
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy