NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 208.0GB/s)
5184 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla K20c
3.524 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
+292%
13.82 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Jan 2021
Tesla
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
320bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2496
Shading Units
7680
208
TMUs
240
40
ROPs
120
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
36.71 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
146.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
3.524 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
1175 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
500W
550 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GK110-885-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
8 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
