NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (5GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla K20c
+625%
3.524 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Jun 2011
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
2496
Shading Units
256
208
TMUs
32
40
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
36.71 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
146.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.524 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
1175 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
142W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110
GPU Name
GF100
GK110-885-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
