NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla K20c
+980%
3.524 TFLOPS
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Aug 2014
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
64bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2496
Shading Units
192
208
TMUs
16
40
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
36.71 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
146.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.524 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
1175 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
35W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK110
GPU Name
GK107
GK110-885-KA-A1
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.5
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
