CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
VS
NVIDIA Tesla K20c
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 208.0GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (110W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla K20c
3.524 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
+126%
7.987 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c
VS
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
May 2019
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1110 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
40
-
Compute Units
-
2496
Shading Units
2560
208
TMUs
160
40
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
40
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
36.71 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
99.84 GPixel/s
146.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.97 TFLOPS
3.524 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
1175 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
249.6 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GK110
GPU Name
TU104
GK110-885-KA-A1
GPU Variant
N19E-Q3-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Board Design
225W
TDP
110W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
2
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA GRID K220Q
3
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300
4
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Tesla K40st
5
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075
6
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB
7
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000
8
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA GRID K140Q
9
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
10
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy