Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20c +367%
3.524 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2496
Shading Units
576
208
TMUs
48
40
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

36.71 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
146.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.524 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
1175 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
GK104
GK110-885-KA-A1
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.5
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy