NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro VX 200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c and 512MB VRAM Quadro VX 200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (5GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro VX 200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla K20c
+1298%
3.524 TFLOPS
Quadro VX 200
0.252 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Jan 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro VX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
2496
Shading Units
112
208
TMUs
56
40
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
36.71 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
146.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.524 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
252.0 GFLOPS
1175 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110
GPU Name
G92
GK110-885-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
