Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20X vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

NVIDIA Tesla K20X vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20X and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20X 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
Lower TDP (55W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20X +180%
3.935 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Dec 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2688
Shading Units
640
224
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

235W
TDP
55W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy