Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20X vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

NVIDIA Tesla K20X vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20X and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20X 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
2680 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20X +18638%
3.935 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
May 2009
Tesla
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
2688
Shading Units
8
224
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

235W
TDP
23W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy