Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm and 6GB VRAM Quadro 6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 143.4GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20Xm +282%
3.935 TFLOPS
Quadro 6000
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Dec 2010
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
747 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
143.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
2688
Shading Units
448
224
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

235W
TDP
204W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy