Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 88.13GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1036MHz
Lower TDP (55W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20Xm +85%
3.935 TFLOPS
Quadro M2200 Mobile
2.122 TFLOPS
Blender
Tesla K20Xm +383%
372
Quadro M2200 Mobile
77
OctaneBench
Tesla K20Xm +50%
63
Quadro M2200 Mobile
42
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Jan 2017
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
695 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1036 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1377 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
88.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2688
Shading Units
1024
224
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.15 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.30 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.122 TFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
66.30 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
55W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
GM206
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy