Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1815MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 249.6GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (230W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20Xm
3.935 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 +183%
11.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Aug 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1815 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
48
-
Compute Units
-
2688
Shading Units
3072
224
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.2 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
348.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.30 TFLOPS
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.15 TFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
348.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
TU104-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Board Design

235W
TDP
230W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy