NVIDIA Tesla K40c vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Tesla K40c and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla K40c 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock876MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 245W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla K40c
+1702%
5.046 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Jan 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
745 MHz
Base Clock
-
876 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
2880
Shading Units
112
240
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
52.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
210.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.046 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
1.682 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
245W
TDP
78W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK180
GPU Name
G92
GK180-890-A1
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
