Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K40m vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

NVIDIA Tesla K40m vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Tesla K40m and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K40m 's Advantages
Lower TDP (245W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 102% (1770MHz vs 876MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 288.4GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K40m
5.046 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 +223%
16.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Aug 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

745 MHz
Base Clock
1440 MHz
876 MHz
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
72
2880
Shading Units
4608
240
TMUs
288
48
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
169.9 GPixel/s
210.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
509.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.62 TFLOPS
5.046 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.31 TFLOPS
1.682 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
509.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

245W
TDP
260W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy