Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K40m vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q

NVIDIA Tesla K40m vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Tesla K40m and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K40m 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 85% (1620MHz vs 876MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 245W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K40m +52%
5.046 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Max Q
3.318 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Tesla K40m
68
Quadro T2000 Max Q +4%
71
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
May 2019
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

745 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
876 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
2880
Shading Units
1024
240
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
210.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
5.046 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
1.682 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

245W
TDP
40W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy